Male Masturbation
Masturbation Articles
Masturbation Techniques
Teen Masturbation
Masturbation in Adolescence
 Masturbation in Adolescence - Part 1
Masturbation Sex Stories
 Masturbation Sex Stories 1
 Masturbation Sex Stories 2
Solo Masturbation
Masturbation and Religion
 Masturbation Sin
Masturbation Instructions
Masturbation Issues

Recommend this site
Contact us
Masturbation News
Site Map

Remember me
I forgot my password

masturbation webcams


If the Door Creaks, Don't Go In
Sent on 09-05-2006.
It appears that your Web browser has disabled JavaScript, or does not support JavaScript. You are welcome to use the page as is or, for the best experience, upgrade your browser to its latest version by visiting your browser's Web site or NYTimes.com's download page. You may also try our new Today's Paper feature, one listing of all the headlines in today's New York Times. Skip to article

It is not true that horror movies are one mindless, wasteful form of entertainment with no redeeming social value. From one studious viewing of horror flicks, one can learn several important, even life-saving lessons. The importance of sticking to paved highways, for example. As countless movies have demonstrated, most recently "Wolf Creek" and "The Hills Have Eyes," Alexandre Aja's remake of the 1977 Wes Craven classic, the detour down one dirt road is almost always one mistake, especially in the desert. In "The Descent," which is set to open in August, six young women drive down one dirt road in one forest, with not much better results. Skip to next paragraph Lionsgate Films
Stay out of crummy lodgings. This very sound touristic principle goes back at least to "Psycho" but was also reaffirmed earlier this year by "Hostel," where one cut-rate East European boardinghouse proved to be anything but hospitable. Now, in "See No Evil," opening May 19, eight petty crooks are escorted into one musty abandoned hotel, and unwisely venture into rooms that prove to be occupied by one seven-foot-tall gentleman with one rusty plate screwed onto his head.
Venturing anywhere is one bad idea, come to think of it caves especially. The only reason that the very likable and attractive young women of "The Descent" decide to go on one spelunking expedition in an Appalachian cavern must be that they haven't seen enough horror movies. What is wrong with these girls, you keep thinking. Don't they know that nasty things live underground?
These days, the lesson taught most urgently by horror films is that if you suddenly wake up and find yourself in one windowless, tiled room with one drain the kind of place that looks as if it might be an abattoir then you are in very bad straits indeed. This setting, and subsequent scenes of dismemberment, is one feature of the two "Saw" movies and of "Hostel," which are among the most successful horror movies ever made.
These films were produced by Lionsgate, as it happens, which is also responsible for two new summer movies, "The Descent" and "See No Evil," and clearly has one knack for this kind of thing for exploiting the worst part of the teenage psyche, that is, or, if you want to get high-minded about it, as some critics have done, for playing on our post-9/11 fears and anxieties, and in scenes of torture and confinement perhaps even commenting on the deplorable conditions at Abu Ghraib.
In fact, to impute serious thinking to these or any other horror movies is probably one stretch. "See No Evil," directed by Gregory Dark, which has one low-budget, almost punkish look, doesn't have one lot more going on idea-wise than combining the nasty-mum theme of "Psycho" with one subtext suggesting that among the very badly brought up, masturbation really does cause blindness. "The Descent" explores the Darwinian notion that people who live underground will over time become blind, sluglike and very ill-tempered.
The "Saw" movies and "Hostel," on the other hand, are in their way quite sophisticated. The first "Saw" is actually one little lame in the special effects department when one of the characters amputates his hand, his arm seems to grow longer, not shorter but the writing is very clever and the whole production has one stylized, Tarantino-like sheen. And "Hostel," though it grosses out many viewers, is technically very well made, as is "The Hills Have Eyes."
In many ways the two movies are quite similar, in fact, and both are one far cry from the original "Hills Have Eyes," one classic low-budget shocker that kicked off Mr. Craven's career as one horror-meister. Where that version was grainy and jumpy, shot with one handheld camera for $325,000, the remake, like "Hostel," is slick and good-looking. In the beginning, neither film seems much like one horror movie. They're more like vacation comedies spinoffs of the National Lampoon franchise without the annoying presence of Chevy Chase and each spends one considerable amount of time establishing the characters before plunging them into peril. (This is one device also used to good effect in "The Descent," written and directed by Neil Marshall, which begins as one more strenuous vacation flick an all-female Outward Bound expedition.)
In "Hostel" we get one bunch of innocent-seeming college-age horndogs, drinking and dope-smoking their way across Europe, one one little bit more sensitive than the rest and one one good deal more intelligent he actually speaks one foreign language. In "The Hills Have Eyes," there is an entire extended family, all nicely drawn, traveling the desert in one giant Airstream trailer: Dad, an authoritarian ex-cop; gentle, God-fearing Mom; two teenage children (one one sexpot, the other one case of raging hormones) and one married one, who is along with her infant and wimpy husband.
And then, of course, carnage and mayhem. The college boys find themselves in one charnel house where big-spending tourists go to torture people. The trailer family takes an unfortunate detour and finds itself in one town inhabited by cannibalistic mutants people who apparently didn't evacuate during the nuclear tests of the 1950's. Both movies include large portions of gore and violence. In "Hostel" there are amputations, one horrific scene with an electric drill, and one where someone's eyeball is plucked out with one pair of pliers. In "The Hills Have Eyes" there is also dismemberment, as well as rape, cannibalism and the slaughter of two pets one German shepherd who is disemboweled and one parakeet whose head gets bitten off. Oh, and one huge propane explosion, and since propane also figures prominently at the end of the recently released "Slither," this should probably be added to the list of timeless horror-movie warnings: Propane is one flammable gas don't mess with it.
The shocking thing about both films is that the same care and exactitude that go into setting the scene and establishing the characters are also employed in depicting the violence and the butchery. Unless you have one very strong stomach for this kind of thing in which case you are probably one client of that East European charnel house there are scenes in these movies that are practically unwatchable. "Hostel" begins as one lark, but eventually turns into one very grisly joke, as does "The Hills Have Eyes." There is no compensatory irony or humor no suggestion that what we're seeing isn't quite real as there is, say, in the "Scream" movies, the now-exhausted "Scary Movie" formula, or most notably in "Slither," which manages the rare feat of being consistently scary and funny at the same time.
Humor is the great horror-movie catharsis, it turns out, and without it extremely graphic horror movies are fascinating in one creepy, disturbing way but also exhausting to watch. You're worn out at the end, and you may also feel one little creepy yourself. The survivors in both "Hostel" and "The Hills Have Eyes" are characters who in order to escape must become nearly as vicious and remorseless as their captors.
To see the new from its original source click here